Strategi Komunikasi Dakwah di Era Algoritma: Model Kurasi Konten Berbasis Takhrij Digital untuk Da'i dan Penyuluh Agama Islam

Zulfikar Zulfikar; Muhammad Fathi Salim

doi:10.51590/wai.v2i1.28

Authors

Zulfikar Zulfikar Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Muhammad Fathi Salim Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51590/wai.v2i1.28

Keywords:

Religious authority crisis, social media algorithms, digital takhrij, Islamic knowledge curation, authoritative Islamic literacy

Abstract

The crisis of religious authority in the era of social media algorithms is characterized by the widespread dissemination of fragmented, unverified Islamic knowledge that often neglects classical scholarly authority, leading to simplistic and biased religious understanding. This study aims to develop a digital takhrij-based knowledge curation model as an innovative strategy to strengthen authoritative Islamic literacy. The research employs a qualitative method with a conceptual-analytical approach through recent literature review and analysis of religious content distribution practices in digital spaces. The findings reveal that integrating hadith takhrij principles with digital technology enables systematic, transparent, and adaptive source verification aligned with contemporary information consumption patterns. This model functions not only as a validation tool but also as an educational mechanism that encourages deeper understanding of sanad, matn, and scholarly context. In conclusion, digital takhrij-based knowledge curation offers a strategic solution to reconstruct credible religious authority in the age of information disruption while fostering critical, contextual, and responsible Islamic literacy.

References

Brown, Jonathan A C. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. Simon and Schuster, 2017.

Campbell, Heidi A, and Ruth Tsuria. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Culture. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003108948.

———. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media. Routledge, 2021.

Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. “Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches,” 2018.

Denzin, Norman K, and Yvonna S Lincoln. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2018.

Epstein, Robert, and Ronald E Robertson. “The Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME) and Its Possible Impact on the Outcomes of Elections.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, no. 33 (2015): E4512–21. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419828112.

Floridi, Luciano, Josh Cowls, Monica Beltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Christoph Luetge, et al. “An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.” Minds and Machines 28, no. 4 (2018): 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.

Miles, Matthew B, A Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014.

Nisa, Eva F. “Creative and Lucrative Da’wah: The Visual Culture of Instagram amongst Female Muslim Youth in Indonesia.” Asiascape: Digital Asia 5, no. 1–2 (2018): 68–99. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340085.

Slama, Martin. “Practising Islam through Social Media in Indonesia.” Indonesia and the Malay World 46, no. 134 (2018): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1416798.

Snyder, Hannah. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104 (2019): 333–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.